Black HSS Drill Bit Set (25 Piece) (08853) - high speed drill bits

I don’t know why unit conversions should lead to errors – 25.4mm has for decades been the exact metric equivalent of an inch (i.e. inch defined as).  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inch

Having reached pensionable age (66 for me) less than a couple of months ago, I’m of that generation that is happy with both imperial and French measurement systems. I use whatever comes to hand. I did snaffle a number of cutters from the Blading Shop at work after it was closed and a small number of inserts. If I’d known that they were all going into a skip (several thousand pounds worth at scrap metal value, work paid to get rid of them!!!), I’d have overloaded the car with them 🙁 . Be that as it may, on the Beaver milling machine I use mostly metric cutters and Imperial cutters when needed or available. On the little BCA jig borer it’s either 1/4″ or 3/8″ threaded cutters (just got a £ton worth delivered from Tracy Tools) until I get around to making some FC3 holders to use cheaper cutters.

If the inly purpose is to remove metal from a dace, the size of the cutter will have little bearing on the choice. A 10mm end mill will remove 0.025″ just as effectively as a 3/8″, from a face.

3 Flute Carbide Roughing End Mill for Aluminium 16mm Diameter 16mm Plain Shank 100mm Long 42mm Flute Length 3 Flutes 35° Helix.

Certainly in my days of motorcycle riding instructing and examining I was continually reminded how different folk are in the rate of learning / understanding and how much difference regular riding made to what, and how, you could usefully tell them. Post exam debriefs I found most stressful. Want them to progress but very conscious that telling it the wrong way could get them killed due to conceptually grabbing the wrong end of the stick.

Using a cutter dimensioned in the other system means I either have to measure after the first cut to verify exactly where the edge lies or touch off the cutter on the workpiece before deciding on cut step-over. Either cigarette paper or feeler gauge methods work fine for me but its another step and potential for error.

Simply reflecting my thinking – if I’m cutting a 10mm slot, I’ll be looking for a mill a bit less than 10mm for the main cut, then bringing the slot to size with. For reasons unknown, my brain probably won’t go “looking for 9.5mm, or 9.525mm” – so this labelling fits that.

Everything else (roughing, facing, side milling, slot cutting) can all be done with metric or imperial, so long as the mill is smaller.than the final feature to allow for finishing cuts.

Given his prodigious output I sometimes feel that Jason doesn’t quite appreciate how different things are for folk whose workshop time is severely limited by family and other responsibilities. If a couple of evenings a week and the odd half day on some weekend is all that can be scrounged getting into the zone is hard, if its possible at all, hence a more measured approach with full awareness of the potential errors may be more productive.

Indeed so if you work in the traditional manner using dials and touching off the cutter. The step-over doesn’t care about cutter dimensions as its governed by dial calibrations.

Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop are leading magazines for modellers, with reputations for bringing you the best tips, tricks, and inspiration from the model engineering world. From miniature steam locomotives to clocks and tools, get the most out of your hobby with Model Engineer and Model Engineer's Workshop.

I imagine running a CNC system almost manually setting travel limits on the machine supplemented by the MPG pendant has a similar crop of superficially trivial benefits that can add up to a lot. I really, really wish my DRO system could be linked in to control feed stops.

If I did that the sides of the cut slot will be a very poor finish. When tidied up the slot would be wider than the cutter.

It really only makes mental arithmetic easier, if you want to cut a 1.00 wide feature with a 1/2″ cutter you either offset 1/8 or 0.125 each side or move the spindle 3/4″ or 0.750 from an edge.

In this case, as a someone who will be embracing DRO over dials, and a 100% metric child of the 80s, I’ll follow that path of least resistance. No fractions unless I absolutely have to! Any imperial cutters will be labelled with reference to their metric proximity e.g. 3/8″ will be “a bit less than 10mm”.

Writing the DRO settings for each cut down on the whiteboard next to the mill before I start makes for a much more restful job as well as reducing the chances of a boo-boo. Now my machining is more fits and starts than really regular I’m much more conscious of the time it takes to get fully into gear and flowing in “the zone” where things just go right.

Simply reflecting my thinking – if I’m cutting a 10mm slot, I’ll be looking for a mill a bit less than 10mm for the main cut….

These days I’m only likely to take an imperial cutter out of the draw if I want to cut a narrow keyway or even less likely want to plunge an imperial diameter.

Either way, and though helped by a DRO, I still measure the work as it approaches the finished size. Nevertheless it is better to use cutters that match the drawing dimensions, for anything more than simply squaring off the sides of the work.

To summarise, buy a few metric cutters as standard; 3, 4, 6 and 10mm diameter covers most needs. Then buy other cutters, metric and imperial, as needed and new or secondhand based on need, availability and cost analysis.

Though I can if I must I prefer not to prat about with inch fractions.  They just make life complicated, which is why Imperial drawings increasingly dropped fractions in favour of thou during the 20th century.

I occasionally use a 1/2″ shank tool (sensitive drill) in my little mill with an 1/2″ MT2 collet – but that needs the drawbar changing to an imperial one. Metric collets and my ER16 adapter all use M10.

Far more important is to keep the cutters (always slot cutters and end mills in my case) in their nice little plastic containers as in Jason’s photograph. The containers are for their protection, not your’s.

Use a 10mm slotdrill, one pass and job done. The slot width will be as accurate as the grinding of the cutter, usually a few tenths undersize.

Simply reflecting my thinking – if I’m cutting a 10mm slot, I’ll be looking for a mill a bit less than 10mm for the main cut….

However, as I described above, if you use and exploit a DRO set-up there are considerable benefits if both cutter and job are dimensioned in the same system. Many folk don’t really appreciate how different exploiting a DRO is to working with old style dials and how much of a difference seemingly trivial things make. Mostly in ease of doing things quickly and correctly.

Error creeps in doing the same with a 12mm cutter that needs converting to imperial and then the sums doing for offset and you may well want to reach for a calculator rather than doing the simple maths in your head.

In practice, 99% of the limited Imperial machining I do can be achieved with metric tooling without much fuss.  Needing a short 3/8″ slot recently I cut it by widening a 8mm slot:  took a little longer.  But if I had to do a lot of 3/8″ slotting it would make much more sense to order a 3/8″ cutter.  Same applies to Imperial chaps needing the occasional metric dimension – not difficult to widen a 3/8″ slot out to 10mm, but might be worth investing in a metric cutter.

Search for: Home › Forums › Beginners questions › Topics Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total) Topic Voices Posts Last Post Diesel 1 2 Started by: Vic in: The Tea Room 20 44 14 October 2024 at 01:44 Paul Kemp 3 1/2 juliet Started by: 474564 in: Help and Assistance! (Offered or Wanted) 6 18 14 October 2024 at 01:28 Paul Kemp Mini Mill Switch Controller Help Please Started by: Blue Heeler in: Manual machine tools 2 3 14 October 2024 at 00:12 Blue Heeler Allchin Crown Stay Started by: Peter Howell 1 in: Traction engines 5 6 14 October 2024 at 00:04 duncan webster 1 Milling Cutter insert radius Started by: Vic in: Workshop Tools and Tooling 2 2 13 October 2024 at 23:58 Nigel Graham 2 Warco mill lubrication Started by: Peter Venn in: Workshop Tools and Tooling 10 16 13 October 2024 at 23:18 Dave Halford My mini lathe won’t latch on Started by: Paul McDonough in: General Questions 4 5 13 October 2024 at 22:47 Huub Lathe vibration in workshop Started by: Mark Salzedo 1 in: General Questions 11 19 13 October 2024 at 21:04 Dave Halford Renishaw touch probe bits Started by: gerry madden in: Electronics in the Workshop 5 14 13 October 2024 at 21:01 Michael Gilligan Thiel Nassovia vertical metal saw 1 2 Started by: Sonic Escape in: General Questions 9 31 13 October 2024 at 20:53 Sonic Escape Hemingway engraving tool Started by: Mike Waldron in: Manual machine tools 4 14 13 October 2024 at 20:08 Mike Waldron Creworks Chinese Mini Lathe – interesting Started by: Lee Cooper in: Manual machine tools 9 19 13 October 2024 at 19:40 not done it yet How long will a 3 Jaw chuck last Started by: Kim Garnett in: General Questions 16 25 13 October 2024 at 18:45 not done it yet Filament Dryers Started by: Colin Heseltine in: 3D Printers and 3D Printing 6 9 13 October 2024 at 17:44 Colin Heseltine My very own Quick Change toolpost 1 2 Started by: Iain Downs in: Workshop Tools and Tooling 16 32 13 October 2024 at 17:01 mark smith 20 Burdett 70 Mk2 Surface Grinder Started by: Me. in: General Questions 4 9 13 October 2024 at 12:12 Me. Zeamons Orrery Started by: Alan Charleston in: Help and Assistance! (Offered or Wanted) 9 18 13 October 2024 at 11:50 ChrisLH brushless DC motor for mini lathe 1 2 Started by: Henry Rancourt in: General Questions 23 49 13 October 2024 at 11:42 Dell Jekyll’s “Pendulous” Engine c 1870 1 2 Started by: JasonB in: Stationary engines 8 27 13 October 2024 at 10:20 JasonB The Incredible Shrinking Hose Started by: Greensands in: The Tea Room 10 10 13 October 2024 at 09:16 larry phelan 1 My Grandson & I steaming the new RAT Steam Engine Started by: Blue Heeler in: Stationary engines 2 3 13 October 2024 at 04:51 Blue Heeler Cleanup and deburring wheels Started by: colinb in: Beginners questions 6 6 12 October 2024 at 22:09 Vic What did you do Today 2024 1 2 … 16 17 Started by: JasonB in: The Tea Room 62 407 12 October 2024 at 21:32 Nicholas Farr New guy from Norway, planning a Bonelle grinder 1 2 Started by: Fulmen in: Introduce Yourself – New members start here! 18 44 12 October 2024 at 20:56 Fulmen alchin 1.5 scale traction engine HELP Started by: joseph tatler in: Traction engines 4 5 12 October 2024 at 20:16 noel shelley   Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

Metric cutters are more readily available commercially if buying new. But imperial cutters are still available from other sources such as Ebay.

Taking centre of job and centre of spindle as my references suits me just fine for all normal work but cutter and job need to be dimensioned in the same system.

Home › Forums › Beginners questions › Endmills – metric Vs imperial This topic has 26 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 20 May 2024 at 17:46 by Graham Meek. Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 27 total) 1 2 → Author Posts 18 May 2024 at 08:27 #731262 colinbParticipant @colinb Is there any functional reason to prefer one over the other? Mine will be a metric shop, but of course imperial end/facemills are much more common on the secondhand market. I am trying to think of pros/cons, and so far, the only differentiators I’ve come up with are: Plunging counterbores – or any other operation where the diameter of mill actually matters Minimisation of error – unit conversions inevitably lead to errors, picking up a mill that’s a fraction over rather than a fraction under size Everything else (roughing, facing, side milling, slot cutting) can all be done with metric or imperial, so long as the mill is smaller.than the final feature to allow for finishing cuts. Do I have the right picture here?   Advert 18 May 2024 at 09:33 #731274 Thor 🇳🇴Participant @thor I mainly use metric end mills and slot drills because that is what is available where I live, I do have a few small imperial ones (bought in the UK). Thor 18 May 2024 at 09:38 #731275 Anonymous On 18 May 2024 at 08:27 colinb Said: Is there any functional reason to prefer one over the other? Despite the endless, but ultimately fruitless, arguments on here about metric versus imperial it doesn’t matter a jot. Metric cutters are more readily available commercially if buying new. But imperial cutters are still available from other sources such as Ebay. My engine build is imperial, but for professional work I mainly use metric. My go to cutters for the vertical and CNC mills are 6mm and 10mm 3-flute centre cutting uncoated carbide cutters and the same sizes but polished, specifically for aluminium. For the engines I have a range of imperial slot drills (bought new) for keyways and counterboring. I buy others as needed; metric from commercial suppliers, imperial mostly secondhand. I have also bought a lot of larger cutters secondhand. They come in handy, especially on the horizontal mill, and I wouldn’t have been able to afford them new: To summarise, buy a few metric cutters as standard; 3, 4, 6 and 10mm diameter covers most needs. Then buy other cutters, metric and imperial, as needed and new or secondhand based on need, availability and cost analysis. Andrew 18 May 2024 at 10:10 #731281 John HaineParticipant @johnhaine32865 I don’t know why unit conversions should lead to errors – 25.4mm has for decades been the exact metric equivalent of an inch (i.e. inch defined as).  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inch Easy to compute metric diameters for all common imperial cutter sizes to more precision than any home milling machine. Used cutters, whether imperial or metric, are not likely to be very sharp so if you are going to use a lot then equip yourself with a means to sharpen them. 18 May 2024 at 10:16 #731286 JasonBModerator @jasonb These days I’m only likely to take an imperial cutter out of the draw if I want to cut a narrow keyway or even less likely want to plunge an imperial diameter. As Andrew says 4, 6 & 10 will do to start with for most jobs then buy anything you specifically need On my CNC where I tend to use Carbide just about every cutter is 6mm or less and I have a reasonable selection. 18 May 2024 at 11:37 #731314 Clive FosterParticipant @clivefoster55965 If, as I do, you have a DRO system, and set your reference to the centre of the material using a wiggler or edge finder on each side along with the 1/2 function its most convenient to use a cutter dimensioned in the same way as the job. Metric cutter for metric jobs, imperial for imperial. That way picking up from the centre means I can directly set where the edges of the first and subsequent cuts will lie. So the whole job can be done directly off the DRO scale with no measurement needed beyond final verification that all is within tolerance. Using a cutter dimensioned in the other system means I either have to measure after the first cut to verify exactly where the edge lies or touch off the cutter on the workpiece before deciding on cut step-over. Either cigarette paper or feeler gauge methods work fine for me but its another step and potential for error. The step-over doesn’t care whether the cutter is metric or imperial but you need to know here you are starting from. Taking centre of job and centre of spindle as my references suits me just fine for all normal work but cutter and job need to be dimensioned in the same system. Clive 18 May 2024 at 11:48 #731315 Peter Cook 6Participant @petercook6 Drawbar thread? I occasionally use a 1/2″ shank tool (sensitive drill) in my little mill with an 1/2″ MT2 collet – but that needs the drawbar changing to an imperial one. Metric collets and my ER16 adapter all use M10. 18 May 2024 at 12:18 #731318 JAParticipant @ja Like others, I do not understand the question. One uses both with very little concern. Far more important is to keep the cutters (always slot cutters and end mills in my case) in their nice little plastic containers as in Jason’s photograph. The containers are for their protection, not your’s. JA 18 May 2024 at 13:01 #731323 Clive FosterParticipant @clivefoster55965 On 18 May 2024 at 12:18 JA Said: Like others, I do not understand the question. One uses both with very little concern.   JA Indeed so if you work in the traditional manner using dials and touching off the cutter. The step-over doesn’t care about cutter dimensions as its governed by dial calibrations. However, as I described above, if you use and exploit a DRO set-up there are considerable benefits if both cutter and job are dimensioned in the same system. Many folk don’t really appreciate how different exploiting a DRO is to working with old style dials and how much of a difference seemingly trivial things make. Mostly in ease of doing things quickly and correctly. I imagine running a CNC system almost manually setting travel limits on the machine supplemented by the MPG pendant has a similar crop of superficially trivial benefits that can add up to a lot. I really, really wish my DRO system could be linked in to control feed stops. Clive 18 May 2024 at 13:18 #731326 JasonBModerator @jasonb It really only makes mental arithmetic easier, if you want to cut a 1.00 wide feature with a 1/2″ cutter you either offset 1/8 or 0.125 each side or move the spindle 3/4″ or 0.750 from an edge. Error creeps in doing the same with a 12mm cutter that needs converting to imperial and then the sums doing for offset and you may well want to reach for a calculator rather than doing the simple maths in your head. I tend to fully convert old imperial designs to metric eg metric nominal sizes so 3/8″ becomes 10mm not 9.53 so even simpler to do maths with whole millimeters rather than several decimal places. so 6mm cutter needs offsetting 2mm each side if a slot or 7mm in from an edge. 18 May 2024 at 13:47 #731329 DiogenesParticipant @diogenes Yes I use a mixture of metric and imperial cutters – since you mention counterbores, sometimes a cutter from the ‘other’ system will let you cut a counterbore, spotface, or what have you that is ‘neater’ than the ‘book’ for your native system – manufacturing does seem to like a (grossly) slack fit for such things. If you have a DRO it’s not too hard to switch to ‘Imp’ to figure the offsets, and then back again to metric for the rest of the job.. ..I have mixed ‘systems’ within the same job a couple of times.. ..it’s good for one’s mental agility..   18 May 2024 at 16:09 #731336 Clive FosterParticipant @clivefoster55965 Diogenes At (almost) 70 I can do without any more things said to be good for mental agility! Writing the DRO settings for each cut down on the whiteboard next to the mill before I start makes for a much more restful job as well as reducing the chances of a boo-boo. Now my machining is more fits and starts than really regular I’m much more conscious of the time it takes to get fully into gear and flowing in “the zone” where things just go right. Given his prodigious output I sometimes feel that Jason doesn’t quite appreciate how different things are for folk whose workshop time is severely limited by family and other responsibilities. If a couple of evenings a week and the odd half day on some weekend is all that can be scrounged getting into the zone is hard, if its possible at all, hence a more measured approach with full awareness of the potential errors may be more productive. Certainly in my days of motorcycle riding instructing and examining I was continually reminded how different folk are in the rate of learning / understanding and how much difference regular riding made to what, and how, you could usefully tell them. Post exam debriefs I found most stressful. Want them to progress but very conscious that telling it the wrong way could get them killed due to conceptually grabbing the wrong end of the stick. A working life spent doing weapons systems guidance stuff does pre-dispose towards caution. Clive 18 May 2024 at 16:14 #731337 JasonBModerator @jasonb Clive, that is about the amount of time I get in the workshop. I’m not retired and have other interests too. 18 May 2024 at 20:10 #731374 Howard LewisParticipant @howardlewis46836 If the inly purpose is to remove metal from a dace, the size of the cutter will have little bearing on the choice. A 10mm end mill will remove 0.025″ just as effectively as a 3/8″, from a face. BUT, if you need a counterbore or slot of a definite size, then Metric or Imperial will matter. I use whatever seems most appropriate at the time. Howard 18 May 2024 at 21:53 #731406 Nigel Graham 2Participant @nigelgraham2 As with Howard: and using specific diameters only where really necessary. Either way, and though helped by a DRO, I still measure the work as it approaches the finished size. Nevertheless it is better to use cutters that match the drawing dimensions, for anything more than simply squaring off the sides of the work. If as I do you use a Clarkson ‘Autolock’ or equivalent you do need ensure the collets are correct metric or imperial as even the closest (probably 5/16″ / 8mm) are not interchangeable. The metric collets have a groove turned in their heads to help you differentiate them from Imperial – and I similarly marked the metric collets I made for a Hemingway Kits T&C Grinder. Incidentally I sometimes use just the dials, if the milling operation is simple and not too critical. 19 May 2024 at 08:12 #731429 colinbParticipant @colinb Much input, and much appreciated – thank you. Confirms what I thought – horses for courses, where the course comprises both the machine tooling and the operator! In this case, as a someone who will be embracing DRO over dials, and a 100% metric child of the 80s, I’ll follow that path of least resistance. No fractions unless I absolutely have to! Any imperial cutters will be labelled with reference to their metric proximity e.g. 3/8″ will be “a bit less than 10mm”. Time will tell how this pans out for me… 19 May 2024 at 08:30 #731431 John HaineParticipant @johnhaine32865 Why not 9.53mm? 19 May 2024 at 08:46 #731433 Nicholas FarrParticipant @nicholasfarr14254 Hi, On 19 May 2024 at 08:30 John Haine Said: Why not 9.53mm? Because 3/8″ is 9.525mm I’ll get my coat. Regards Nick. 19 May 2024 at 09:41 #731439 SillyOldDufferModerator @sillyoldduffer On 19 May 2024 at 08:12 colinb Said: … Confirms what I thought – horses for courses, where the course comprises both the machine tooling and the operator! … More I think the type of work that needs to be done.   My workshop is deliberately metric throughout because that very much suits the things I make.   I would only have gone Imperial if: I was personally 100% imperial trained or an American someone gave me a fully equipped Imperial workshop I intended to specialise on repairing Imperial equipment – restoring old cars etc My hobby consisted in building locomotives to any of the many excellent Imperial plans drawn in the last century In practice, 99% of the limited Imperial machining I do can be achieved with metric tooling without much fuss.  Needing a short 3/8″ slot recently I cut it by widening a 8mm slot:  took a little longer.  But if I had to do a lot of 3/8″ slotting it would make much more sense to order a 3/8″ cutter.  Same applies to Imperial chaps needing the occasional metric dimension – not difficult to widen a 3/8″ slot out to 10mm, but might be worth investing in a metric cutter. Though I can if I must I prefer not to prat about with inch fractions.  They just make life complicated, which is why Imperial drawings increasingly dropped fractions in favour of thou during the 20th century. Dave 19 May 2024 at 14:25 #731476 colinbParticipant @colinb Simply reflecting my thinking – if I’m cutting a 10mm slot, I’ll be looking for a mill a bit less than 10mm for the main cut, then bringing the slot to size with. For reasons unknown, my brain probably won’t go “looking for 9.5mm, or 9.525mm” – so this labelling fits that. Nothing stopping me doing both, of course! 19 May 2024 at 14:27 #731478 colinbParticipant @colinb I think this is more or less where I am at! 19 May 2024 at 14:57 #731481 Anonymous On 19 May 2024 at 14:25 colinb Said: Simply reflecting my thinking – if I’m cutting a 10mm slot, I’ll be looking for a mill a bit less than 10mm for the main cut…. Use a 10mm slotdrill, one pass and job done. The slot width will be as accurate as the grinding of the cutter, usually a few tenths undersize. Andrew 19 May 2024 at 16:56 #731488 JAParticipant @ja On 19 May 2024 at 14:57 Andrew Johnston Said: On 19 May 2024 at 14:25 colinb Said: Simply reflecting my thinking – if I’m cutting a 10mm slot, I’ll be looking for a mill a bit less than 10mm for the main cut…. Use a 10mm slotdrill, one pass and job done. The slot width will be as accurate as the grinding of the cutter, usually a few tenths undersize. Andrew Oh for an ideal world! If I did that the sides of the cut slot will be a very poor finish. When tidied up the slot would be wider than the cutter. This is nothing to do with cutters and all to do with the quality of the milling machine used (in my case, well used and German). Some skill is just knowing the limitations of one’s tools. JA 19 May 2024 at 21:18 #731527 Mark RandParticipant @markrand96270 Having reached pensionable age (66 for me) less than a couple of months ago, I’m of that generation that is happy with both imperial and French measurement systems. I use whatever comes to hand. I did snaffle a number of cutters from the Blading Shop at work after it was closed and a small number of inserts. If I’d known that they were all going into a skip (several thousand pounds worth at scrap metal value, work paid to get rid of them!!!), I’d have overloaded the car with them 🙁 . Be that as it may, on the Beaver milling machine I use mostly metric cutters and Imperial cutters when needed or available. On the little BCA jig borer it’s either 1/4″ or 3/8″ threaded cutters (just got a £ton worth delivered from Tracy Tools) until I get around to making some FC3 holders to use cheaper cutters. 20 May 2024 at 08:17 #731562 John HaineParticipant @johnhaine32865 On 19 May 2024 at 14:25 colinb Said: Simply reflecting my thinking – if I’m cutting a 10mm slot, I’ll be looking for a mill a bit less than 10mm for the main cut, then bringing the slot to size with. For reasons unknown, my brain probably won’t go “looking for 9.5mm, or 9.525mm” – so this labelling fits that. Nothing stopping me doing both, of course! If the first cut is “a bit less than 10mm” how will you know how much more to take off unless you know how much less the diameter is? Author Posts Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 27 total) 1 2 → Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

If you have a DRO it’s not too hard to switch to ‘Imp’ to figure the offsets, and then back again to metric for the rest of the job.. ..I have mixed ‘systems’ within the same job a couple of times.. ..it’s good for one’s mental agility..

If as I do you use a Clarkson ‘Autolock’ or equivalent you do need ensure the collets are correct metric or imperial as even the closest (probably 5/16″ / 8mm) are not interchangeable. The metric collets have a groove turned in their heads to help you differentiate them from Imperial – and I similarly marked the metric collets I made for a Hemingway Kits T&C Grinder.

Diesel 3 1/2 juliet Mini Mill Switch Controller Help Please Allchin Crown Stay Milling Cutter insert radius Warco mill lubrication My mini lathe won’t latch on Lathe vibration in workshop Renishaw touch probe bits Thiel Nassovia vertical metal saw

Used cutters, whether imperial or metric, are not likely to be very sharp so if you are going to use a lot then equip yourself with a means to sharpen them.

If the first cut is “a bit less than 10mm” how will you know how much more to take off unless you know how much less the diameter is?

More I think the type of work that needs to be done.   My workshop is deliberately metric throughout because that very much suits the things I make.   I would only have gone Imperial if:

That way picking up from the centre means I can directly set where the edges of the first and subsequent cuts will lie. So the whole job can be done directly off the DRO scale with no measurement needed beyond final verification that all is within tolerance.

My engine build is imperial, but for professional work I mainly use metric. My go to cutters for the vertical and CNC mills are 6mm and 10mm 3-flute centre cutting uncoated carbide cutters and the same sizes but polished, specifically for aluminium. For the engines I have a range of imperial slot drills (bought new) for keyways and counterboring. I buy others as needed; metric from commercial suppliers, imperial mostly secondhand. I have also bought a lot of larger cutters secondhand. They come in handy, especially on the horizontal mill, and I wouldn’t have been able to afford them new:

Simply reflecting my thinking – if I’m cutting a 10mm slot, I’ll be looking for a mill a bit less than 10mm for the main cut, then bringing the slot to size with. For reasons unknown, my brain probably won’t go “looking for 9.5mm, or 9.525mm” – so this labelling fits that.

I mainly use metric end mills and slot drills because that is what is available where I live, I do have a few small imperial ones (bought in the UK).

This is nothing to do with cutters and all to do with the quality of the milling machine used (in my case, well used and German). Some skill is just knowing the limitations of one’s tools.

Use a 10mm slotdrill, one pass and job done. The slot width will be as accurate as the grinding of the cutter, usually a few tenths undersize.

Yes I use a mixture of metric and imperial cutters – since you mention counterbores, sometimes a cutter from the ‘other’ system will let you cut a counterbore, spotface, or what have you that is ‘neater’ than the ‘book’ for your native system – manufacturing does seem to like a (grossly) slack fit for such things.

Mine will be a metric shop, but of course imperial end/facemills are much more common on the secondhand market. I am trying to think of pros/cons, and so far, the only differentiators I’ve come up with are:

If, as I do, you have a DRO system, and set your reference to the centre of the material using a wiggler or edge finder on each side along with the 1/2 function its most convenient to use a cutter dimensioned in the same way as the job.

I tend to fully convert old imperial designs to metric eg metric nominal sizes so 3/8″ becomes 10mm not 9.53 so even simpler to do maths with whole millimeters rather than several decimal places. so 6mm cutter needs offsetting 2mm each side if a slot or 7mm in from an edge.