Corner Rounding Machines - Trimmers for Documents & Cards - rounder cutter
HRChardnessfull form
The information provided by Think & Tinker on precisebits.com (the "Site") and our web application is for general informational purposes only. All information and specifications on the Site and our web application are provided in good faith, and we endeavour to keep it as up to date as possible, however we make no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability or completeness of any information and specifications on the Site or our web application. Your use of the Site and our web application and your reliance on any information and/or specifications on these platforms is solely at your own risk. Although every effort is made to keep the Site and our web application up and running smoothly, due to the nature of the Internet and the technology involved, Think & Tinker takes no responsibility for and will not be liable for the Site or our web application being temporarily unavailable due to technical issues (or otherwise) beyond its control or for any loss or damage suffered as a result of the use of or access to, or inability to use or access this Site or our web application whatsoever. To the extent not prohibited by law, in no circumstances shall Think & Tinker be liable to you or any other third parties for any loss or damage (including, without limitation, damage for loss of business or loss of profits) arising directly or indirectly from your use of or inability to use, the Site, our web application or any of the material contained in it.
Approximate equivalents between the Brinell and Rockwell hardness scales, as well as their rough correlation to material tensile strength. Brinell 3000kg Load 10mm Ball Rockwell Approx Tensile Strength, psi Diameter, mm Hardness Number B Scale C Scale 2.25 745 - 65.3 - 2.30 712 - - - 2.35 682 - 61.7 - 2.40 653 - 60.0 - 2.45 627 - 58.7 - 2.50 601 - 57.3 - 2.55 578 - 56.0 - 2.60 555 - 54.7 298,000 2.65 534 - 53.5 288,000 2.70 514 - 52.1 274,000 2.75 495 - 51.0 264,000 2.80 477 - 49.6 252,000 2.85 461 - 48.5 242,000 2.90 444 - 47.1 230,000 2.95 429 - 45.7 219,000 3.00 415 - 44.5 212,000 3.05 401 - 43.1 202,000 3.10 388 - 41.8 193,000 3.15 375 - 40.4 184,000 3.20 363 - 39.1 177,000 3.25 352 110.0 37.9 170,000 3.30 341 109.0 36.6 163,000 3.35 331 108.5 35.5 158,000 3.40 321 108.0 34.3 152,000 3.45 311 107.5 33.1 147,000 3.50 302 107.0 32.1 143,000 3.55 293 106.0 30.9 139,000 3.60 285 105.5 29.9 136,000 3.65 277 104.5 28.8 131,000 3.70 269 104.0 27.6 128,000 3.75 262 103.0 26.6 125,000 3.80 255 102.0 25.4 121,000 3.85 248 101.0 24.2 118,000 3.90 241 100.0 22.8 114,000 3.95 235 99.0 21.7 111,000 4.00 229 98.2 20.5 109,000 4.05 223 97.3 18.8 104,000 4.10 217 96.4 17.5 103,000 4.15 212 95.5 16.0 100,000 4.20 207 94.6 15.2 99,000 4.25 201 93.8 13.8 97,000 4.30 197 92.8 12.7 94,000 4.35 192 91.9 11.5 92,000 4.40 187 90.7 10.0 90,000 4.45 183 90.0 9.0 89,000 4.50 179 89.0 8.0 88,000 4.55 174 87.8 6.4 86,000 4.60 170 86.8 5.4 84,000 4.65 167 86.0 4.4 83,000 4.70 163 85.0 3.3 82,000 4.80 156 82.9 0.9 80,000 4.90 149 80.8 - - 5.00 143 78.7 - - 5.10 137 76.4 - - 5.20 131 74.0 - - 5.30 126 72.0 - - 5.40 121 69.8 - - 5.50 116 67.6 - - 5.60 111 65.7 - -
It's no secret that we are known as experts in the fastener industry and have been since 1912. Our devotion to customer service, quality products, and on-time deliveries have propelled us to success since our inception.
Hardness of steelschart
Hardness testing of steel is typically done on one of two scales, Rockwell or Brinell. These two scales are similar and each has equivalents on the other scale, similar to the relationship between Celsius and Fahrenheit. They differ in their testing methodology, but both are indentation hardness scales, operating on the principal that material tensile strength is directly correlated to the amount a hardened ball (or cone) will penetrate.
There are seven separate scales under the Rockwell umbrella, letters A-G, but the most common scales used on steel are B and C, often abbreviated HRB and HRC respectively. The B scale is typically used on softer steels, those under approximately 115,000psi tensile. Testing on the B scale involves a 1/16” steel sphere and a load of 100kgf. The testing machines then determines the amount of indention and assigns it a hardness number, example 98 HRB. Readings above 100 HRB are generally considered unreliable, so the C scale is then used. The C scale is typically used on harder steels, like those above about 110,000psi tensile. Testing on the C scale involves a 120° diamond cone and a load of 150kgf. The test is carried out the same way as the B scale test above, and the result is written as 28 HRC. Readings below 20 HRC are generally considered unreliable, so the B scale is used.
These calculators are currently BETA. Formatting, validations, and calculators may change. While we have done our best to check for errors and failures you might be more “lucky” than we were. If you run into a problem please let us know.
Hardness of steelspdf
Orders received by noon on the day before the beginning of the holiday should ship the same day.Normal operating hours resume on the first business day following the last day of the holiday.
The Brinell hardness testing method is similar to the above Rockwell testing method with a couple differences. A typical test on steel uses a 10mm diameter steel (or tungsten) ball with 3,000kg of force. A steel ball is used for most materials; the tungsten ball is used primarily for harder materials like tool steel. When a steel ball is used, the result is written as BHN or HBN, example 285 HBN. When a tungsten ball is used, the result is written as HBW, W is the chemical symbol for tungsten (wolfram). Brinell testing is generally considered to be more accurate because the larger ball size makes deeper and wider indentations, thereby averaging the test out over a wider amount of material. However, due to the larger nature of the indentations, it is often considered a destructive test.
These are calculators. They don’t know what you are cutting, your tooling, the physics of all the interactions, or the specifics of your machine / setup. The results are based on YOUR input. Bad input equals bad results (and possibly broken tools).